Decentralisation metrics

Who mines, who holds, who votes.

Computed by this node from its own DAG and state at every page load; any node gives the same numbers for the same tip. Also as JSON at /api/metrics and through the RPC method psy_metrics.

Share of blue blocks by miner (last day)

Mining spread

How evenly PSY is held (Lorenz curve)

Actual
Perfectly equal

Participation

Mining (blue blocks, chain blocks #3128 to #11767)

Counted	5 miner addresses
Largest	29.91 %
Largest five	100 %
Nakamoto coefficient (fewest that exceed 50 %)	2
HHI (1 = one holder)	0.2213
Gini	0.1831
Blue blocks	11,095

Counts are per miner address. One operator can use several addresses and pools are invisible on-chain, so true concentration can be higher.

Miner	Blue blocks	Share
0xb32c47f5…de28c7	3,318	29.91 %
0x3a9be549…926af3	2,612	23.54 %
0x2751b3d4…71a2ef	2,272	20.48 %
0xe6f3c26a…4f6991	1,616	14.57 %
0xce0725a1…6dc307	1,277	11.51 %

Holdings (PSY in ordinary addresses)

Counted	2,527 addresses
Largest	28 %
Largest five	99.96 %
Nakamoto coefficient (fewest that exceed 50 %)	2
HHI (1 = one holder)	0.2135
Gini	0.9979

System contracts (Treasury, team vesting, NGO pool, committee, vote escrow) and the burn address are not counted; locked PSY sits in the vote escrow.

Participation

Locked for voting: 0 PSY, 0 % of the circulating PSY.

Less than half of the PSY is locked. In the first election a small group holding a large share of the mined PSY can then decide most seats: lock and vote if you hold PSY.

Mode	Bootstrap
Locked for voting	0 PSY (0 % of circulating)
Proposals	0 · turnout baseline 0 PSY
NGOs	0 minted · 0 / 100 elected · 0 ballots in the latest round
Finality committee, epoch 0	0 members · 0 checkpoints · signing rate –

Recent proposals

#	Kind	Turnout (of locked PSY at the snapshot)	Yes voters
No proposals yet.